I used to believe there was no difference between studs and sluts and this was reflected in a post I wrote called 'the egg and sperm race'. In that post I examined the reasons why culturally men are hailed as sexual hero's for having numerous sexual conquests whereas women are condemned for sleeping around and having numerous sexual partners. They are often called slags for example.
However it has recently been made clear to me the difference and there is indeed a difference.
Men are studs because for a man to be a success with lots of women he has to be good looking, charming, charismatic, perhaps rich.
Whereas for women to have lots of sexual partners she merely has to be available. It is not hard for a woman to get laid, regardless of how she looks, sounds or presents herself. If she's easy, she is in with a chance.
This is why men, despite wanting sex with whoever they 'date' would prefer that the woman say 'no' to sex at least once. This shows them that the woman is a little bit selective and so once they've been selected their self value increases.
Your thoughts?
Subscribe to my guide on being the best lover she ever had here:
1 comments:
Why, why, you ask WHY
It's the age old practice of "double-standards" that's why.
As long as men are men and women are women -- men will have their famous male logic of double-standards.
It hasn't changed since the beasts were created.
Post a Comment